Legal Opinion

Banker v. Miller

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 20, 1909No. Gen. No. 14,883PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Trespass on the case. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John H. Hums, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chytraus

This action is one of trespass on the case. On June 18, 1908, a judgment was rendered in the Municipal Court against defendants there, appellants here, for $750. At the time of the rendition and entry of the judgment appellants were allowed an appeal to this court. So far as now material the order entered by the court was as follows: “Whereupon the defendants, by their counsel, # * # pray an appeal from the judgment of this court to the Appellate Court of the First District of Illinois, which appeal is allowed by the court, conditioned upon the defendants filing their appeal bond herein in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Underwood v. HossackIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Ferris v. Commercial National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hawes v. People ex rel. PulverIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Moore v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Hall v. Royal Neighbors of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dunshee v. DunsheeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  2. People v. PowersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
  3. Tomaszewski v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911
  4. People v. CantwellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API