Legal Opinion

Cavender v. Waddingham

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1876PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Brown on Stat. Fr. (ed. 1873), sec. 511, pp. 391, 402, 411, 414; Hook v. Turner, 22 Mo. 333 ; Wag. Stat. 1015,1033,1034, sec. 8, p. 1040, sec. 15 ; Martin v.Martin’s Admr., 27 Mo. 227 ; Irwin v. Childs, 28 Mo. 576 ; Thompson v. Mosley, 29 Mo. 477; Alterbery v. Powell, 29 Mo. 429; Green v. Gallager, 35 Mo. 226; Archer v. Merchants & Manufacturers’ Ins.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Brown on Stat. Fr. (ed. 1873), sec. 511, pp. 391, 402, 411, 414; Hook v. Turner, 22 Mo. 333 ; Wag. Stat. 1015,1033,1034, sec. 8, p. 1040, sec. 15 ; Martin v.Martin’s Admr., 27 Mo. 227 ; Irwin v. Childs, 28 Mo. 576 ; Thompson v. Mosley, 29 Mo. 477; Alterbery v. Powell, 29 Mo. 429; Green v. Gallager, 35 Mo. 226; Archer v. Merchants & Manufacturers’ Ins. Co., 43 Mo. 442 ; Ward v/Pine, 50 Mo. 38 ; Barry v. Coombe, 1 Pet. 640; Kay v. Curd, 6 B. Mon. 103; 1 Sugden on Yeud. (3d Am. ed.) 258, 259 ; lb. 259, sec. 8 and notes, ]i. 260, note t; King’s Admr. v.…

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

The petition states that plaintiffs, under the partnership ¡style of Cavender & Rowse, are real estate agents and brokers. That, on February 28, 1874, defendant employed them to purchase for him from Messrs. John A. and William H. Scudder “a lot of ground in blocks numbered 23 and 24 in the city of St. Louis, fronting one hundred and eighty-three feet and five inches on. Main street, by a depth of one hundred and forty-two feet and three inches, being the same lot whereon the Ames pork-house is situated;” that defendant instructed plaintiffs to •offer $600 per foot for the property, and to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Corby v. WeddleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  2. State ex rel. Demuth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Calkins v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  2. Livermore v. CraneWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Morgan v. Whatley & WhatleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Tanner Associates, Inc. v. CiraldoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  5. George T. Smith Middlings Purifier Co. v. RembaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API