Legal Opinion

Scott v. Geiser Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 1, 1904No. 13,797Published

Error from Lane district court; Edward IT. Madison, judge pro tem.

1Opinion

OPINION ON REHEARING.

No. 13,797.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J. :

From the argument made at the first submission of this case the court was led to assume that the notes in controversy were negotiable, but it appears that they contain features which render them non-negotiable, and, hence, the transferees took them subject to all the equities existing between the original parties. The Scotts gave the paper in the purchase of a second-hand thrashing-machine from C. A. Benbow, who transferred the notes and the mortgage securing them to the Geiser Manufacturing Company and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tabor v. PetersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Bennett v. . BuchanNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. McCormick v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  4. Williams v. IngramTexas Supreme Court · 1858

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API