Legal Opinion
K. v. United Behavioral Health
District Court, D. Utah
Decided June 22, 2021No. 2:17-cv-01328Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH D.K. and A.K., Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER vs. Case No. 2:17-CV-01328-DAK UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH and ALCATEL-LUCENT MEDICAL Judge Dale A. Kimball EXPENSE PLAN FOR ACTIVE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES, Defendants. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the court on the parties’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 75, 77.) On June 21, 2021, the court held a hearing on these motions. At the hearing, Brian S. King represented D.K and A.K (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Michael H. Bernstein represented United Behavioral…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Kimber v. Thiokol CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Halo v. Yale Health Plan, Director of Benefits & Records Yale UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Weber v. GE Group Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.