Legal Opinion

Strange v. XYZ Company

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided August 21, 2020No. 6:19-cv-01623Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA JASPER DIVISION CLINTON STRANGE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) 6:19-cv-01623-LSC ) XYZ COMPANY, ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff’s motion for expedited discovery is before the Court. (Docs. 2 & 3). Plaintiff, Clinton Strange, brought this action pro se. He asserts consumer protection claims against an unknown defendant. The Complaint refers to Defendant by a fictitious name (“XYZ Company”). (Doc. 1.) The Plaintiff admits he “has no idea who the Defendant really is.” (Doc. 2 at ¶ 2.) He hopes that,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Christopher J. Weiland v. Palm Beach County Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Richardson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  3. John D. Dean v. David Barber, Mel Bailey, Jefferson County's Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. EchazabalSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Daryl Rondel Williams v. DeKalb County JailCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API