Legal Opinion

Kimbro v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 21, 1959No. 58-269PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, Judge.

The plaintiff in an action appeals from a final judgment based upon an adverse jury verdict and assigns as error certain charges given by the court. The defendant-appellee is an insurance company and was defending an action by the plaintiff as beneficiary under one of its policies. The plaintiff claimed double indemnity benefits on the policy issued upon her husband’s life, which provided as follows:

*275“Accidental Means Death Benefit— The Company promises to pay to the Beneficiary under this Policy, in addition to the amount otherwise payable according to the terms of this Policy,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fire Ass'n v. Evansville Brewing Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. Mason v. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of TennesseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  3. Potts v. MulliganSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  4. Anderson v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. Broward v. SledgeSupreme Court of Florida · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martin v. Dade Muck Land Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1928
  2. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. M. Patricia BreslinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  3. Russell v. HarwickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. Peninsular Life Insurance Company v. HanrattyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  5. Massachusetts Casualty Insurance v. JohansenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API