American Nat. Ins. Co. v. Ingle

The majority having based their conclusion solely on interpretation of the contract of insurance sued upon, which I view is in direct conflict with the opinion, of the Commission of Appeals, in The Praetorians v. Redmon, Tex.Com.App., 123 S.W.2d 644, 648 (adopted by our Supreme Court), I deem it unnecessary to extend, discussion of my adverse holding to that of the majority. In the cited case, the plaintiff sought recovery on an obligation in the policy to pay double indemnity, whilst in the instant case plaintiff sought recovery for the face value of the policy. In all other respects, the…