Legal Opinion

Braden v. Hall

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1933Published

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

On March 12, 1931, the plaintiff and the defendant addressed a letter, hereinafter, for brev ity, referred to as an escrow agreement, to the United States National Bank of Portland, Oregon, reading as follows:

“This escrow agreement hereby entered into this 12th day of March, 1931, by and between A. E. Braden, party of the first part, and Charles Hall, party of the second part, is in words and figures as follows, to wit:
“The party of the first part herewith places with you 850 shares of the common stock of the Conservation Corporation of America, being

£ ‘ Certificate No. 24 for 50 shares

‘ ‘…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. May v. EmersonOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Wallace Bank & Trust Co. v. First National Bank of FairfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Ward v. Klamath CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. McMillan v. BattenOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Klinge v. FarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API