Legal Opinion

City of Sheridan v. Litman

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1924No. 1201PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kimball, Justice.

This action was commenced in the municipal court of the City of Sheridan by the City, as plaintiff, against F. Lit-man, defendant. The complaint charged that on or about October 18, 1922, in said city, the defendant “did unlawfully carry on and conduct the business of selling dry goods, shoes and millinery without first having paid a license tax provided in Ordinance 529 of the City of Sheridan, Wyoming, passed, adopted and approved May 9, 1922.”

The trial in the municipal court resulted in the conviction of the defendant, who was fined $5. He appealed to the district court,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re the Executors & Legatees of & Under the Last Will & Testament of McPhersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Willard v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  4. State ex rel. City of Fargo v. WetzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  5. People Ex Rel. Burrows v. Supervisors of Orange CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Rawlins v. Frontier Refining CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Sprague v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Sublette County School District No. 1 v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Guidi v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Guidi v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API