Legal Opinion

Matakonis v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 7, 1980No. Appeal, No. 1365 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish,

The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board affirmed the referee’s dismissal of a widow’s fatal claim petition for compensation on the ground that her husband’s death, while employed as a dispatcher for Interstate Motor Freight, was a natural progression of chronic, degenerative heart disease, complicated by an acute myocardial infarction, and quite unrelated to work activities or conditions.1 We affirm.

Where the question in a workmen’s compensation case is whether death was a product of a work-related *569injury, a pre-existing pathology, or both,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. American Refrigerator Equipment Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Forbes Pavilion Nursing Home, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. BowenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Aluminum Co. of America v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Lewis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aversa v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Matlack, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API