Matakonis v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Crumlish,
The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board affirmed the referee’s dismissal of a widow’s fatal claim petition for compensation on the ground that her husband’s death, while employed as a dispatcher for Interstate Motor Freight, was a natural progression of chronic, degenerative heart disease, complicated by an acute myocardial infarction, and quite unrelated to work activities or conditions.1 We affirm.
Where the question in a workmen’s compensation case is whether death was a product of a work-related *569injury, a pre-existing pathology, or both,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Refrigerator Equipment Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Forbes Pavilion Nursing Home, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. BowenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Aluminum Co. of America v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Lewis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Aversa v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Matlack, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983