Curtis v. Saint Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Wilkin, J., presiding, refusing a "modification of the judgment entered in that court, May 4, 1874, after the order denying a new trial had been affirmed by this court. See 20 Minn. 28.
1Opinion of the CourtCornell, J.
This is an appeal from an order made at a special term of the district court of Ramsey county, denying a motion of defendant to set aside or modify the judgment entered in said action, on the ground that the same did not conform to the requirements of the statute under which the proceedings therein were had.
From the record before us, the following must be assumed as facts established upon the hearing and determination of said motion in the district court. The defendant, being a *498railroad, corporation organized under the general laws of the state, after having located its line of road across…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Weir v. St. Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
3Cited by5 opinions
- Witt v. St. Paul & Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Fletcher v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Bellingham Bay & British Columbia Railroad v. StrandWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- County of Hennepin v. MikulaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Robbins v. Saint Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877