Legal Opinion

Wilkerson v. Burlington Northern Railroad

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 8, 2000No. 1990769Published

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Justice.

This case presents the question whether the statute of limitations bars the plaintiffs action to recover damages for injuries he alleges he suffered as a result of an alleged workplace exposure to asbestos. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that that question may not be answered until a jury determines when the plaintiffs cause of action accrued.

Thomas Edison Wilkerson sued his former employers, Burlington Northern Railroad Company (“Burlington”) and Illinois Central Railroad Company (“Illinois Central”), alleging “severe injury to his body and respiratory system,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Dxs, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, F/k/a Flint X-Ray, Inc. v. Siemens Medical Systems, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Jn Exploration & Production v. Western Gas Resources, Inc., Jn Exploration & Production v. Western Gas Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  5. LeBlang Motors, Ltd. v. Subaru of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API