Legal Opinion
Sentell v. Richardson
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 10, 1947No. 38162PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’NIELL, Chief Justice.
The plaintiff is suing for 25 shares of the capital stock of a corporation styled Minden Sanitarium, Inc. He claims the stock by virtue of a sale made to the defendant, Dr. Thomas A. Richardson, who, he alleges, was his agent for buying the stock. The suit is founded upon a written contract dated at Minden, La., September 10, 1945, and signed by the plaintiff and Dr. Richardson, as follows:
“This is a contract between Doctors C. S. Sentell and T. A. Richardson.
“Dr. Sentell agrees to advance to Dr. Richardson the money necessary to purchase 10 to 25 shares of stock of…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Hassett v. McColley (In Re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Woodlawn Park Ltd. v. Doster Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Succession of QuaglinoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- Feldheim v. Plaquemines Oil and Development Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Hughes v. Graves Construction, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.