Legal Opinion

Harris v. Stucki

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 12, 1967No. 43068PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

A summary judgment should be granted only when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact for submission to a jury. Holland v. Sanfax Corp., 106 Ga. App. 1 (126 SE2d 442); Dillard v. Brannan, 217 Ga. 179 (121 SE2d 768); Code Ann. § 110-1203. In making the determination of whether there is a genuine issue as to a material fact the evidence is to be construed in favor of the opposing party. McCarty v. National Life &c. Ins. Co., 107 Ga. App. 178 (129 SE2d 408). Under Code Ann. § 68-1656 (a) it becomes very material whether plaintiff stepped backward across the dividing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holland v. Sanfax CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. McCarty v. National Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Dillard v. BrannanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colonial Stores, Inc. v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Biggs v. McDougallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Colonial Stores, Inc. v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. Harris v. StuckiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API