Legal Opinion

Freiler v. Kear

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1890No. Appeal, No. 119Published

Appeal, No. 119, Jan. T., 1890, to C. P. Schuylkill Co., to review judgment on verdict in action on the case by Daniel Freiler and Barbara Freiler, his wife, in right of the wife, against F. G. Kear and Daniel Freiler, trading as F. G. Kear & Co., at Jan. T., 1885, No. 100. McCollum, J., absent. The declaration contained three special counts and the common counts for money had and received, etc.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 119, Jan. T., 1890, to C. P. Schuylkill Co., to review judgment on verdict in action on the case by Daniel Freiler and Barbara Freiler, his wife, in right of the wife, against F. G. Kear and Daniel Freiler, trading as F. G. Kear & Co., at Jan. T., 1885, No. 100. McCollum, J., absent. The declaration contained three special counts and the common counts for money had and received, etc. The special counts allege, in substance, that the defendant became a tenant to the plaintiff from year to year, at an annual rent of $800, upon the terms, among other things, that the defendant…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This case has been here before: Freiler v. Kear, 126 Pa. 470. There is nothing in its present aspect that requires further discussion.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Freiler v. KearSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API