Legal Opinion
C. B. Porterfield and Morris Margulis, Intervenors v. L. M. Gerstel, Receiver of Metal Extrusions, Inc., Bankrupt
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 10, 1955No. 14913_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
222 F.2d 137
C. B. PORTERFIELD and Morris Margulis, Intervenors, Appellants,
v.
L. M. GERSTEL, Receiver of Metal Extrusions, Inc., Bankrupt, Appellee.
No. 14913.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 30, 1955.
Rehearing Denied May 10, 1955.
Thomas H. Anderson, Miami, Fla., Marion E. Sibley, Miami Beach, Fla., Joseph Gassen, Sibley & Davis, Miami Beach, Fla., Anderson & Nadeau, Miami, Fla., for appellants.
Marx Faber, Herbert U. Feibelman, Harold Friedman, Miami, Fla., Feibelman & Friedman, Miami, Fla., for appellee.
Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and RIVES and TUTTLE, Circuit Judges.
TUTTL…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zeitinger v. Hargadine-Mckittrick Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- Davis v. GainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Johnson v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- W. F. Potts Son & Co. v. CochraneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- Cochrane v. W. F. Potts Son & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.