Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re: Kidd

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 18, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00800Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT In Re Application of Robert Gordon Kidd No. 3:20-cv-00800 (KAD) for an Order Pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1782

to Take Discovery from John Thomas Reynolds and Mark McCall September 18, 2020 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: RESPONDENTS’ OBJECTIONS TO ORDER DENYING RESPONDENTS’ MOTION TO QUASH (ECF NO. 35) Kari A. Dooley, United States District Judge: Pending before the Court are the objections of Respondents John Thomas Reynolds (“Reynolds”) and Mark McCall (“McCall” and, collectively, the “Respondents”) to Magistrate Judge Farrish’s May 12, 2020 order…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. City of Long BranchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. Construction Products Research, Inc. Five Star Products, Inc. And H. Nash BabcockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. Shcherbakovskiy v. Da Capo Al Fine, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. Kiobel v. MillsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API