Weinstock v. Handler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment, Supreme *274Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered July 23, 1996, after a nonjury trial, dismissing the complaint as against all defendants, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
There is ample evidence that plaintiffs knew that the Walker defendants had previously assigned their interest in the partnership and that the note given in exchange therefor was in default. In absence of an existing contractual or fiduciary relationship, Walker was under no duty to inform plaintiffs of any purported defenses to the note (see, 900 Unlimited v MCI Telecommunications Corp., 215 AD2d 227;…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- 900 Unlimited, Inc. v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Conlew, Inc. v. UhlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & Erisa Lit.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Weinstock v. ClearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998