Legal Opinion

Committee for Full Employment v. Hills

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1976No. Civ. A. No. 76-210PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CAHN, District Judge.

The plaintiffs1 in this case are Committee for Full Employment by James Tarlau, Trustee Ad Litem, and James Carr, individually and on behalf of other persons who are unemployed and face mortgage foreclosure actions. The defendants are United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and its Secretary, Carla A. Hills. (Both of these federal defendants will be referred to hereinafter as “HUD”.)

Plaintiffs, who request declaratory and injunctive relief on behalf of themselves and a nationwide class, contend that HUD has violated mandatory…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Coleman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Rubylee Davis, in No. 73-1249. v. George W. Romney, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, in No. 73-1420Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  5. Nixon v. SiricaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Amesquita-PadillaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API