Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Sprinkle v. Shinseki

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 24, 2013No. 18-2223PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge REYNA.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge TARANTO.

REYNA, Circuit Judge.

Jimmy Sprinkle appeals a decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, which denied his claims for entitlement to service connection for mitral valve prolapse and benign familial myoclonus. See Sprinkle v. Shinseki, No. 10-3231, 2012 WL 573644, 2012 U.S.App. Vet. Claims LEXIS 284 (Vet.App. Feb. 23, 2012). We agree that Mr. Sprinkle was not denied fair process as it related to responding to a medical exam ordered by the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (“Board”).…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Gonzales v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Thurber v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
  4. Cushman v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  5. Austin v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Beraud v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Tianjin Wanhua Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
  3. Frantzis v. McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
  4. Jacqueline S. Roberts v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014
  5. Beraud v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API