State v. Tyson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
Defendant Darrius Lavale Tyson contends on appeal that his right to equal protection of the law was violated because the trial court improperly denied his motion to be provided with a transcript before retrial after his first trial resulted in a mistrial. As the oral findings of the trial court do not reflect the legal standard required by controlling caselaw, we remand to the trial court for a new trial.
Defendant was indicted for robbery with a dangerous weapon. Defendant’s case first came on for trial on 21 February 2011. However, the jury was unable to reach a unanimous…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Britt v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GaddisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. GaddisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. GaddisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- State v. GaddisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021