Legal Opinion

Bellman v. Epstein

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1917No. 11360PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the First Branch Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on writ of error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John J. Sullivan, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

The appellant, Fannie J. Bellman, administratrix of the estate of Henry J. Bellman, deceased, brought this’suit in the municipal court of Chicago against the appellee, Max Epstein, upon a promissory note executed by the appellee to Henry J. Bellman, dated October 20, 1907, for $1000, due eight months after date. The defendant, in answer to the statement of claim, set up the following defenses: (1) No consideration; (2) failure of consideration; (3) that the note was an accommodation note; (4) payment of the note to Elias Mayer, by authority of Bellman, in discharge of Bellman’s debt to Mayer.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Feitl v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Thrasher v. Pike County RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Schneider v. SulzerIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Smith v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Godfrey v. PhillipsIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hays v. Illinois Industrial Home for the BlindIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Gilberto v. NordtvedtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  3. Gieseke v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. Johnson v. MatthewsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  5. Oulvey v. ConverseIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API