Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Bowman
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided June 1, 1970No. 69-1287-CivPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR GARNISHEE
MEHRTENS, District Judge.
This cause came on to be heard on motions for summary judgment by plaintiff-garnishor Boyd and garnishee United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (U.S.F. & G.). The parties stipulated to the following facts:
1. Plaintiff-Garnishor Boyd was a pedestrian when struck by a Pontiac automobile owned by Defendant Amelia Bowman, which was operated by her husband, Defendant Charles M. Bowman. Boyd sued the Bowmans in the Dade County Circuit Court, and the Bowmans were defended in said suit by Western *580Casualty and Surety Company, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. Charles CratonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Farley v. American Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
- Henry Farber and Sam Levy, Third-Party v. Great American Insurance Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- State Security Life Insurance v. KintnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
- Caldwell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boyd v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Bess C. Boyd, Plaintiff-Garnisher v. Charles M. Bowman and Amelia Bowman v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Garnishee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Bess C. Boyd, Plaintiff-Garnisher v. Charles M. Bowman and Amelia Bowman v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Garnishee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972