Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 5, 1987No. 86-969Published

1Per curiam

Miller appeals his conviction of burglary of a dwelling with a battery1 and his sentence which resulted in a four-bracket departure beyond the presumptive sentence recommended by the guidelines.2 We affirm the conviction, but vacate the sentence.

The sole reason for the departure in this case was Miller’s habitual offender status. This is no longer a valid reason to impose a departure sentence under the guidelines.3 Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

AFFIRM CONVICTION; VACATE SENTENCE AND REMAND FOR RE-SENTENCING.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and DAUKSCH and SHARP, JJ., concur..…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Neeley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API