Legal Opinion

W. W. Blake Tobacco Co. v. Posluszsy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1906No. Appeal No. 53PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal No. 53, April T., 1906, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co.', Dec. T., 1903, No. 76, discharging rule to open judgment in case of W. W. Blake Tobacco Company v. George (alias W.) Posluszsy and M. Debinsld. Rule to open judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was the order of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

The plaintiff, through its attorneys, caused judgment to be entered against George (alias W.) Posluszsy and M. Debinsld *604upon a bond and accompanying warrant of attorney for confession of judgment, purporting to have been signed by W. Posluszsy as principal and M. Debinsld as surety. Execution was issued thereon, by virtue of which the goods of the appellant, whose full name is Martin Debinski, were levied upon. Upon his petition setting forth the discrepancies between the bond and the record of the judgment, and denying that he signed or authorized any person to sign the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Augustine v. WolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Earley's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  3. Commonwealth v. MelletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Gump v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Koch v. BieseckerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Atkins v. GristSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  2. Toffolo v. MarinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Kennett v. Naumchuk, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1947
  4. Light v. ShollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Mutual Stock Food Co. ex rel. Farmers' Bank v. Stander, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Union County1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API