Legal Opinion
Borrett-moore & Associates v. United States ex rel. Harwell
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 20, 1966No. 8392PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HICKEY, Circuit Judge.
James P. Harwell, d/b/a J. S. & H. Construction Company, brought this action under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. §§ 270a-270d (1952), against BorrettMoore & Associates, a co-partnership composed of George Ross O. Borrett and Sam T. Moore, and Maryland Casualty Company, a corporation, to recover the reasonable value of labor furnished Borrett-Moore at Los Alamos, New Mexico, on a government contract. BorrettMoore was the prime contractor for the construction of an A.E.C. facility and Maryland Casualty was its payment bond surety. J. S. & H. agreed to provide the labor for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company v. United States of America for the Use of H. C. Jones, Doing Business as H. C. Jones Construction Company, Burden Ivy Barfield, Bourdon Ray Barfield, and Oliver Eakle Barfield, as Co-Partners Doing Business as Barfield Construction Company v. United States of America for the Use of H. C. Jones, Doing Business as H. C. Jones Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
3Cited by1 opinion
- Borrett-Moore & Associates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966