Legal Opinion

Quinn v. John Whitaker Ranch Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1939No. 2106PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kimball, Justice.

This is a proceeding in error for review of a declaration of rights in an action under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, §§ 89-2401 to 89-2415, R. S. 1931. The question is whether a state statute prescribing the minimum duty of water appropriated for irrigation has the effect of limiting the quantity of water under rights initiated under Territorial laws and adjudicated by decree of the Territorial courts.

Plaintiffs are users of water for irrigation under rights adjudicated,by decree made in July, 1889, by the Territorial District Court which at that time had exclusive…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Farm Investment Co. v. CarpenterWyoming Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Johnston v. Little Horse Creek Irrigating Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Enterprise Irrigation District v. WillisNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Hamp v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Laramie Irrigation & Power Co. v. GrantWyoming Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Basin Electric Power Cooperative v. State Board of ControlWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. In Re Rights to Use Water in Big Horn RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Montana v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Lewis v. State Board of ControlWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Laramie Rivers Co. v. Wheatland Irrigation DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API