Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Robinson v. Banfield

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Ceetiobabi proceedings.

1Opinion of the CourtForbes, J.

This is a proceeding by certiorari, taken under section 250, chapter 908, of the Laws of 1896. Vol. 1, p. 882.

Prior to the institution of these proceedings by the relator, an illegal assessment had been made against the property held by her as trustee for her children Lucius and Emma D. Robinson.

On a former appeal from said assessment, in 1899, the assess*14ment Avas set aside by the court as illegal, probably upon the theory that the assessment was made against the estate and not against the trustee, and inferentially also for the reason that the assessment was unequal and, exorbitant. These…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zink v. . McManusNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Matter of Appl'n of N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. In re ChadwickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. Brennan v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Lyth v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Adirondack Power & Light Corp. v. DureyNew York Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API