Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Owen

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1963No. 1281Published

1DissentBernstein, Chief Justice

(dissenting)-

I regret that I cannot agree with the majority of the Court for the following reasons.

I disagree with the position the majority has taken as to the instruction on flight. Flight is evidence of guilt and in connection with othei proof may be the basis from which guilt may be inferred. It is the absenting of oneself from the community of the crime out of the fear of or to avoid arrest. It is admitted under the exception to the hearsay rule that allows admissions against interest of a party. See Udall, Evidence § 178 (1960). The relevance of such evidence is based on the proposition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The People v. HerbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State v. FinleyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. RischoIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  4. People v. BreckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. Commonwealth v. LoganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API