Legal Opinion

Judd v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 23, 1926No. 2PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of seduction and sentenced to be confined in the penitentiary for two years and a half. A writ of error was granted by this court to the judgment of conviction. After this writ of error was granted, the plaintiff in error applied to the judge of the trial court for bail for his appearance before the trial court, upon the final determination of the writ of error aforesaid, but bail was refused him. To this judgment of refusal a writ of error was awarded by one of the judges of this court.

Prior to the Code of 1919, bail was permissible after…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  2. Robinson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  3. Dowell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  4. Adams v. El-AminRichmond County Circuit Court · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. DuseSupreme Court of Virginia · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API