Legal Opinion

A. Hartman & Co. v. Sanchez

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 8, 1926No. 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court of Porto Rico, affirming a judgment of the district court of Guayama.

Prior to September, 1917, the plaintiff and defendant owned adjacent estates, and there were doubts and discussion as to the boundaries and areas of their respective properties. As a result, under date of September 8, 1917, a contract was entered into, which (summarized) provided: That the plaintiff and defendant were the record owners of six described tracts constituting a single body of land; that it had been agreed that a .surveyor, Caballero,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. B. Fernandez & Bros. v. Ayllon Y OjedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Gandia v. Porto Rico Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1923
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Pure Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arocho v. People of Porto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926
  2. Laura O’Dell, Holly Zimmerman, and Lauren Miller, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Aya Healthcare, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API