Commonwealth v. Kohl
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentTamilia, Judge
The majority Opinion vacates the judgment of sentence and remands the case for a new trial by holding that the blood alcohol test performed on appellant violated his constitutional rights pursuant to the fourth amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I, section 8, of the Pennsylvania Constitution. I respectfully dissent and would hold that 1) the Implied Consent Statute, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1547(a)(2), clearly creates a constitutionally permissible basis for a search based upon special need in the exercise of a governmental interest; 2) the admission of testimony from a pathologist…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Kravinsky v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Ragan v. SteenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. QuarlesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.