Grocers' Bank v. Penfield
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants, entered on the report of a referee dismissing the complaint in an action upon a promissory note.
1Opinion of the Court
Brady, J.:
The defendant Truax was a depositor with the plaintiffs. He procured from them the discount of a note made by Reon Barnes to his order. When it became due he paid a part of it, and gave two notes of Penfield and Stone, the other defendants, payable to his order, for the balance.
These notes were made for his accommodation, but without restriction as to their use. It seems, from the testimony, that they were obtained for the purpose to which they were applied, and it may be said, as also warranted by the testimony, that the plaintiffs *280knew that they were made for his accommodation.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Weaver v. . BardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Farrington v. Frankfort BankNew York Supreme Court · 1857
- East River Bank v. ButterworthNew York Supreme Court · 1866