Legal Opinion
Hartman v. Municipal Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 10, 1973No. Civ. 32244PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
Appellant was charged with misdemeanor drunk driving in violation of section 23102 of the Vehicle Code in a complaint which also charged a prior conviction of a violation of section 23102. Appellant moved to strike the prior conviction on constitutional grounds. The municipal court denied his motion. Appellant’s petition for writ of mandate in the superior court was denied. He appeals.
Even prior to the pronouncement in Mills v. Municipal Court (1973) 10 Cal.3d 288 [110 Cal.Rptr. 329, 515 P.2d 273], at least two Court of Appeal decisions had concluded that the Boykin-Tahl…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Mills v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. SumstineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Ganyo v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- People v. BernalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. CrosbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.