Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Zeno

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 23, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00079Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD LEWIS, Case No. 1:23-cv-00079-NODJ-BAM 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 13 v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT (Doc. 20) 14 HERBERT ZENO, et al., FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 17 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Richard Lewis’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for 18 default judgment against Defendant Herbert Zeno and Defendant Unknown Riders M.C. 19 (collectively, “Defendants”). (Doc. 20.) The motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 20 28…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API