Legal Opinion

Hammonds v. Holmes

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1977No. B-6468PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHADICK, Justice.

The question here is the preclusive effect of a prior judgment. In the prior suit Burtis Hammonds and his wife, Norma, sued Corsicana National Bank for wrongful foreclosure of a deed of trust on their business property. That suit was resolved by a judgment of dismissal with prejudice, granted on motion of the plaintiffs Ham-monds. Four months later the present suit was filed by Mr. and Mrs. Hammonds “individually and d/b/a The Garden Center and Flower Shop” against Corsicana Bank, Ed Holmes, and Zane Stites for wrongful foreclosure of the same deed of trust on the same…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchendelSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Benson v. Wanda Petroleum CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Oklahoma v. TextasSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Maxey v. Citizens National Bank of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Fuller v. O'NeilTexas Supreme Court · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. First State Bank v. KeilmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Myrad Properties, Inc. v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Knutson v. Morton Foods, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Perryman v. Spart an Tex. Six Capital Partners, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Bonilla v. Roberson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API