Hammonds v. Holmes
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CHADICK, Justice.
The question here is the preclusive effect of a prior judgment. In the prior suit Burtis Hammonds and his wife, Norma, sued Corsicana National Bank for wrongful foreclosure of a deed of trust on their business property. That suit was resolved by a judgment of dismissal with prejudice, granted on motion of the plaintiffs Ham-monds. Four months later the present suit was filed by Mr. and Mrs. Hammonds “individually and d/b/a The Garden Center and Flower Shop” against Corsicana Bank, Ed Holmes, and Zane Stites for wrongful foreclosure of the same deed of trust on the same…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchendelSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Benson v. Wanda Petroleum CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Oklahoma v. TextasSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Maxey v. Citizens National Bank of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Fuller v. O'NeilTexas Supreme Court · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- First State Bank v. KeilmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Myrad Properties, Inc. v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Knutson v. Morton Foods, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
- Perryman v. Spart an Tex. Six Capital Partners, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
- Bonilla v. Roberson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.