Wilson v. Craite
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The judgment creditor’s appeal is based upon the premise that a court does not have the authority to set aside an execution sale on the sole ground that the purchaser, through mistake, paid an excessive price. We agree with that contention. A trial court has the discretion to set aside even a completed execution sale if the price bid is so low as to shock the conscience of the court. Anthony Grignano Co. v. Gooch (1951), 259 Wis. 138, 140, 47 N. W. 2d 895, and Collins v. Smith (1890), 75 Wis. 392, 397, 398, 44 N. W. 510. The rationale for the exercise of that discretion is to insure…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nussbaumer v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF YUMAArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- McCoy v. BrooksArizona Supreme Court · 1905
- Kremer v. ThwaitsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Kentzler v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Smith v. Arizona Engineering Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Family Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Barkwood Landscaping Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State Bank of Florence v. Miller (In Re Miller)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Carhart v. Carhart-Halaska International, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Horicon State Bank v. Kant Lumber Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Chris E. Carhart v. Carhart-Halaska InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.