Legal Opinion

Polhemus v. Trainer

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1866PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Sanderson, J.:

This is an action for money had and received. The plaintiff had judgment in the Court below. The defendant, having first moved for a new trial, which was denied, appeals.

One Godfrey leased to the defendant certain premises for the term of seven years. Thereafter the defendant borrowed of one Schwartz the sum of three hundred dollars, and to secure its payment assigned to him the lease aforesaid. The terms of the assignment were absolute, but Schwartz gave the defendant a written agreement to re-assign the lease to him upon the payment of the three hundred dollars…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jackson ex dem. Norton v. WillardNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  2. Wilson v. TroupCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1823
  3. Jackson ex dem. Curtis v. BronsonNew York Supreme Court · 1822

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Domarad v. Fisher & Burke, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Jackson v. LodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Adams v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Cruz v. Aurora Loan Services LLC (In Re Cruz)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2011
  5. Miller v. BerrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API