Legal Opinion

Hebert v. Conner-Monceaux General Contractors

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 2006No. WCA 05-760Published

1Opinion of the Court

EZELL, Judge.

b The issue in this workers’ compensation case concerns the termination of Greg Hebert’s benefits based on a finding by the workers’ compensation judge that Greg and his wife Patricia made material misrepresentations in order to obtain payment for attendant care services. Mr. Hebert claims Dr. James Perry’s testimony should not have been admitted due to improper communication by the Louisiana Workers’ Compensation Corporation with Dr. Perry and the physical therapist. Without Dr. Perry’s testimony, Mr. Hebert claims that there is no proof of fraud.

FACTS

Mr. Hebert was employed as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  2. Holmes v. HendricksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. City of Shreveport v. BaylockSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  4. Lanthier v. Family Dollar StoreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Wood v. Brian Harris AutoplexLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API