Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Giroux v. McCrea

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 20, 1923Published

1Concurrence

Van Kirk, J. (concurring):

The plaintiff has brought this action to recover the reasonable value of work performed by him and money advanced and expended by him for supplies on defendant’s farm. In pursuance of an arrangement between them this plaintiff went into occupation of this farm late in February. He worked the farm until July twelfth. On June tenth this defendant served upon plaintiff the usual written notice to vacate within thirty days. Thereafter defendant presented his petition to a justice of the peace, who issued a precept requiring plaintiff to vacate on or before July twelfth,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reich v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Taylor v. . BradleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. Crane v. GanungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API