Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fox v. Curry

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1934No. 7,140Published

1DissentJustice Angstman

I agree with most, but not all, that is said in the foregoing opinion. I do not agree that the order appealed from should be affirmed. I think it should be reversed, because, in my opinion, the notice of sale was defective and misleading for failure sufficiently to describe the property proposed to be sold. My associates do not discuss this question further than to say that the specifications of error do not present the question. To this I cannot agree.

In defendant’s motion to set aside the sale it is alleged “that the noticing for sale and the offering for sale and the actual sale of said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Exchange State Bank v. Occident Elevator Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Burton v. KippMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Mulling v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  4. Batini v. IvancichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Gales v. ChristySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1849

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API