Legal Opinion
Wittlin v. Remco, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Illinois
Decided January 5, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 2544PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
PLATT, District Judge.
Plaintiff Albert Wittlin seeks to recover damages from the defendants, Remco, Inc., a corporation, and Illinois Electric Company, a sales agency of Remco, Inc. for patent infringement.
Wittlin filed an application for patent of a “liquid flow indicator” on August 21, 1948. Kenneth R. Newcum, the president of Remco, Inc., filed a similar application ten days later and assigned his interest in the patent to the defendant, Remco, Inc. An interference hearing resulted, and ,on January 6, 1953 Wittlin *58was issued the patent here involved. No. 2,624,308.
The defendant interposed…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Marconi Wireless Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company of America v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Albert Wittlin v. Remco, Inc., and Illinois Electric Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955