Legal Opinion
Brown v. Osgood
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided November 4, 1931PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.
This is a petition to foreclose a mortgage. A motion to shorten the time of redemption is included in the petition, and testimony thereon was taken by both parties on depositions pursuant to section 6 of chancery rule 38. The defendant in his answer admits, in effect, the allegations of the petition, which are essential to entitle the plaintiff to a decree, but he claims allowance in the accounting for certain alleged credits, and also asks for the usual time of one year to redeem. Decree was for plaintiff, with shortened time of redemption, and the defendant appeals.
The chancellor found that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clifford v. West Hartford Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Stevens v. FlandersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Fire District No. 1 v. Graniteville Spring Water Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- Tucker v. YandowSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Hunt v. PaquetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
3Cited by10 opinions
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. GeboSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Burlington Building & Loan Ass'n v. CummingsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- Smith v. White EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
- Spencer v. Lyman Falls Power Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- People's Trust Co. of St. Albans v. FinnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.