Legal Opinion

Connor v. State Treasurer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1952No. Calendar 44,288, 44,289PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Gordon R. Connor and Connor Lumber & Land Company, plaintiffs (herein referred to as Connor), filed petitions against D. Hale Brake, treasurer of the State of Michigan, and commission of conservation of the department of Conservation, defendants (herein referred to as Conservation),for a mandamus to order Conservation to pay certain judgments based on condemnation awards and interest in accordance with Connor’s computations. We issued orders to show cause and of reference to the circuit court of Gogebic county. The petitions are presented on 1 record and will be .discussed accordingly as.our…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Campau v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Department of Conservation v. ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Department of Conservation v. ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Marion v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Appleton Water Works Co. v. City of AppletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Milmar Estate, Inc. v. Borough of Fort LeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Friedt v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Friedt v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Friedt v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API