Peet-Milano Ice Co., Inc. v. Pisciotta
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Per curiam
On December 30, 1935, Louis Pisciotta, appellee, filed in this court motion to dismiss this appeal, stating in the motion “that no valid, legal and proper appeal bond, conditioned as the law directs, was filed herein.”
On January 3, 1936, plaintiff-appellant filed in this court a document styled “Return on Motion to Dismiss Appeal,” in which it stated that, “while not admitting that the appeal bond herein furnished is insufficient,” it “has this day filed a new appeal bond, a certified copy of which is annexed hereto.”
It is provided in Act No. 112 of 1916, § 3, as amended by Act No. 284 of…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Armstrong v. State Ex Rel. EmbrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
- Steed v. BaileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Howell v. State Ex Rel. GoodrichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948