Legal Opinion

Palmetto Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Day

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 15, 1987No. 86-3048PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the plaintiff-mortgagee from a trial court order which awards attorney’s fees to the receiver’s court-appointed attorney in a mortgage foreclosure action. We reverse the order under review and remand the cause for a new evidentiary hearing on the court-appointed attorney’s petition for fees because there was no expert testimony adduced be*333low as to the reasonableness of the claimed attorney’s fees. Instead, the award was based entirely on the testimony of the receiver’s attorney. Plainly, this was fatal to the order under review. See Lewis v. Gramil Corp., 94 So.2d 174,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Gramil Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Feemster v. SchurkmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Tanner v. TannerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Creative Property Management, Inc. v. General Electric Credit Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  5. Wilson v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Silva v. HernandezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Yakubik v. LEE CTY. BD. OF CTY. COM'RSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Yakubik v. Board of County Commissioners of Lee CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Aldama v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. Aldama v. Jpmorgan Chase BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API