Bergdoll v. Suprynowicz
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
The declaration in this action of tort contains four counts. In counts 1 and 2 recovery is sought from the operator and owner, respectively, of the motor vehicle involved in the accident. In counts 3 and 4, for consequential damages, recovery likewise is sought from the operator and owner, respectively. Verdicts were returned for the plaintiffs on all counts. The judge reported two questions for decision.(1) The first question arises out of the denial of the defendants’ motion to strike certain evidence. Dr. Kittredge Anderson, a qualified neurologist called by the plaintiffs, was of opinion…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cook v. Farm Service Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Perry v. Manufacturers National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
3Cited by18 opinions
- Robertson v. Gaston Snow & Ely BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Turnpike Motors, Inc. v. Newbury Group, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Galvin v. Welsh Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Moose v. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- WyattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.