Legal Opinion

Bergdoll v. Suprynowicz

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 2, 1971PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

The declaration in this action of tort contains four counts. In counts 1 and 2 recovery is sought from the operator and owner, respectively, of the motor vehicle involved in the accident. In counts 3 and 4, for consequential damages, recovery likewise is sought from the operator and owner, respectively. Verdicts were returned for the plaintiffs on all counts. The judge reported two questions for decision.(1) The first question arises out of the denial of the defendants’ motion to strike certain evidence. Dr. Kittredge Anderson, a qualified neurologist called by the plaintiffs, was of opinion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cook v. Farm Service Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Perry v. Manufacturers National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Gaston Snow & Ely BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Turnpike Motors, Inc. v. Newbury Group, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Galvin v. Welsh Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Moose v. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  5. WyattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API