Legal Opinion

Kalman v. Cortes

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 28, 2009No. Civil Action 09-684PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BAYLSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff has filed a civil rights action challenging the constitutionality of Title 15, Pa. Cons.Stat. § 1303(c)(2)(h) precluding the use of blasphemy in a corporate name on grounds that it violates the Establishment Clause and the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Plaintiff, who attempted to include the word “hell” in the name of a corporation he was forming, challenges the statute both on its face and as applied, seeking a declaratory judgment that it violates his constitutional rights, a permanent injunction…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Leonardo Martino and Trans One Ii, Inc., a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Loeb v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Serv. Women's Action Network v. MattisDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. Adams Outdoor Adver. Ltd. P'ship v. Pa. Dep't of Transp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Kalman v. CortesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. 707 G STREET RESTAURANT LLC v. JEMAL'S MICKELSON, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. INTERLINK PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. BECERRADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API