Legal Opinion

Banda v. Antelope Valley Union High School District

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 16, 2016No. 14-55300UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

José Banda appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his motion for attorneys’ fees on his Individual with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in reducing the hours spent preparing for the hearing by 35 hours because it adequately explained that counsel “spent 36 hours preparing for the initial hearing and then spent another 49 hours preparing for the continued hearing” when “[t]he issues had not changed either factually or legally as a result of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Martin Gonzalez, Sr. v. City of MaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Welch v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Darnella BARJON and Lee Duran, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John H. DALTON, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oskowis v. Sedona Oak-Creek Unified School District 9District Court, D. Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API