Hartless v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIS, Judge.
On appeal from his conviction of indecent exposure, in violation of Code § 18.2-387, Dennis James Hartless contends that the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing him to an indefinite term of probation. He argues further that his sentence violated his Eighth Amendment right against cruel and unusual punishment. We modify Hartless’s term of probation to be coterminous with his term of suspension of sentence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court thus modified.
Hartless pled guilty to indecent exposure, in violation of Code § 18.2-387. The trial court sentenced him to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jacques v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- Dyke v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
- Nuckoles v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- Cottrell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
3Cited by26 opinions
- Leitao v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
- Andrew McQuay Jacobs v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
- Robert Batten Dunham, Jr. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
- Cuffee-Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
- Reinke v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.